Thursday, April 22, 2021

A Review Of The Jack LalannePower Juicer

Juicing is a health fad that has stood the test of time because of the undeniable benefits of drinking freshly squeezed juice over store bought products. There are many juicers on the market and for many the lure of a Jack Lalanne endorsed machine will make his devices seem much more attractive. 

The Jack LalannePower Juicer mixer claims to provide 30% more juice than leading competitors through a "whisper quiet" system in a matter of seconds. This is an appealing prospect because juicing can be a time-consuming and noisy chore, but does it live up to its promise and what can buyers really expect from this product?

The positive aspects of the Jack LalannePower Juicer

The key selling point of this juicer is undoubtedly the large chute that allows whole fruits and vegetables to be chopped and juiced with greater ease and reduces the time their users have to spend chopping and preparing the food. 

This time-saving device also means that a greater variety of food can be used for more types of juice and the addition of the food processing unit means that the waste is dealt with much more efficiently. What waste that is left behind is much drier than that of other devices, which means more of the juice goes into your glass rather than the trash. 

Additionally, the product, which is much cheaper than its competitors, comes with a sixty day money back guarantee. This is a factor that some users may be glad to take advantage off given the flaws of the product.

The disadvantages of using the Jack Lalanne Power Juicer

Unfortunately, the features listed above are where the benefits of this juicer end because the rest of the claims made in the sales pitch are not realized. A common compliant in user reviews of this Jack Lalanne product is the fact that the motor is not particularly powerful in comparison to other juicers on the market - a factor that may be the cause for the quiet nature of the processor. 

Other negative comments that this device has received refer to the inferior quality of the materials - particularly the way that the "Surgical Quality" blade cuts into the plastic - and the difficulty in cleaning it. The pulp may be drier but many people have had trouble removing it from the different components.

Conclusion

The mixed reviews and mediocre ratings offered by user reviews are a good guide to this product, as is the low cost. It is not a terrible device but it does lack the power and features to make it a brilliant one that can stand up to the competition. The effortless nature of the preparation and the design of the chute is a bonus but there are just too many negative factors to make it worthwhile.

Aurora Rose, who has been juicing for nine years, is a health and wellness enthusiast. During her juicing adventures, she has tested many different types of juicers and is now seasoned at recommending juicers to consumers that will fit their lifestyle. To find a juicer that will fit your needs, visit her all inclusive juicer ratings site where she rates the top juicers on the market.


No comments:

Post a Comment